KobiGPT vs Microsoft Copilot
The decisive question: does your corporate content already live inside Microsoft 365, or is it scattered?
TL;DR
Choose KobiGPT when you need specialist assistants with citations from your files, TR/EN support, and predictable Kobi Kredi usage. Microsoft Copilot may win on ecosystem lock-in—validate with your IT checklist.
Quick facts
- Citations
- KobiGPT: document snippets
- Deployment
- SaaS + self-hosted path
- Pricing model
- Published SME tiers + Kobi Kredi
- Languages
- Turkish and English
Why teams choose KobiGPT
- Compare total cost including indexing and support hours.
- Test answer quality on your own PDFs and policies.
- Check data residency and KVKK alignment.
- Use our compliance checklist tool before rollout.
Product facts
- Ücretsiz plan
- 100 doküman · 2 departman · 120 Kobi/ay(PLAN_CONFIG)
- Starter
- 1000 doküman · 5 departman · 1000 Kobi/ay(PLAN_CONFIG)
- Pro
- 12500 doküman · 25 departman · 12500 Kobi/ay(PLAN_CONFIG)
- Paraşüt (MCP)
- self_hosted(parasut_mcp)
- Tek Sistem ERP (MCP)
- self_hosted(teksistem_mcp)
- Doküman yükleme maliyeti
- 0.1 Kobi(packages/types/src/plan-config.ts → TOKEN_COSTS.DOCUMENT_UPLOAD)
- AI mesajı asgari maliyeti
- 0.1 Kobi(packages/types/src/plan-config.ts → KOBI_MIN_TURN)
Where does the content live?
Microsoft 365 Copilot's structural advantage is location: if SharePoint, OneDrive, Outlook, and Teams are already your environment, Copilot reaches that content with no migration step. If most of your documents sit there, that is a serious advantage and should not be dismissed.
On the KobiGPT side the primary source is direct file upload. For a company whose content lives in the Microsoft ecosystem this implies a migration cost; for a company whose content sits scattered across folders there is a collection step either way. The decision starts with this inventory question, before any feature comparison.
Licensing model and SME scale
Ecosystem products typically license per user per month, usually layered on top of a base subscription. Cost then grows linearly with headcount — in a 50-person company where only 8 people will use it heavily, the licensing decision is still made across the whole roster.
KobiGPT combines a plan quota with usage metering. The Starter plan covers 15 users and 1000 documents, with consumption metered in Kobi Kredi. For the SME profile of few but heavy users, that produces a different cost curve.
Turkish content and local context
The second point of divergence is local context. The interface and answers work in Turkish and English, and department templates are built around local frameworks such as Turkish VAT rules, the Turkish Labour Law, and KVKK. Connectors exist for systems specific to the Turkish market, such as Paraşüt and Tek Sistem.
This does not mean global products lack Turkish support — they have it. The difference is ready integration with local accounting and ERP systems, and department templates written against local legislation. Verify current feature lists on each vendor's own page.
FAQ
Which is faster to pilot?
KobiGPT targets same-week pilots with direct document upload.
Can we use both?
Some teams keep Copilot for M365 and KobiGPT for SME docs.
Hallucinations?
RAG reduces but does not eliminate—always verify citations.
Enterprise SLA?
Contact sales for enterprise; cite public pages only.
Can we connect our SharePoint content?
There is no ready SharePoint connector. Work happens through direct file upload, so content staying in the Microsoft ecosystem requires an export step.
Can both be used together?
Yes. Some teams use Copilot for M365 content and KobiGPT for uploaded SME documents and local ERP data.
Comparison
| Feature | KobiGPT | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Document RAG | Core | Varies |
| Assistant templates | Yes | Varies |
| SME pricing page | Public | Often sales-led |
| Self-hosted | Optional | Varies |