KobiGPT vs Glean
Glean is positioned at enterprise-search scale. The difference sits between connector breadth and SME budget.
TL;DR
Choose KobiGPT when you need specialist assistants with citations from your files, TR/EN support, and predictable Kobi Kredi usage. Glean may win on ecosystem lock-in—validate with your IT checklist.
Quick facts
- Citations
- KobiGPT: document snippets
- Deployment
- SaaS + self-hosted path
- Pricing model
- Published SME tiers + Kobi Kredi
- Languages
- Turkish and English
Why teams choose KobiGPT
- Compare total cost including indexing and support hours.
- Test answer quality on your own PDFs and policies.
- Check data residency and KVKK alignment.
- Use our compliance checklist tool before rollout.
Product facts
- Ücretsiz plan
- 100 doküman · 2 departman · 120 Kobi/ay(PLAN_CONFIG)
- Starter
- 1000 doküman · 5 departman · 1000 Kobi/ay(PLAN_CONFIG)
- Pro
- 12500 doküman · 25 departman · 12500 Kobi/ay(PLAN_CONFIG)
- Doküman yükleme maliyeti
- 0.1 Kobi(packages/types/src/plan-config.ts → TOKEN_COSTS.DOCUMENT_UPLOAD)
- AI mesajı asgari maliyeti
- 0.1 Kobi(packages/types/src/plan-config.ts → KOBI_MIN_TURN)
Enterprise search vs scoped assistants
Glean starts from enterprise search: unifying many SaaS sources — email, messaging, ticketing, document management, code repositories — behind a single search surface. In an organisation with hundreds of employees and dozens of systems, that unification solves a real problem.
KobiGPT targets a narrower problem: department assistants with separated scope over a document archive. Source diversity is deliberately limited — direct file upload and selected MCP connectors. That is not a capability gap but a different assumption about scale.
Scale assumption and budget threshold
Enterprise search products usually arrive with an enterprise sales motion: custom quotes, minimum seat commitments, and an implementation project. That model makes sense at large organisations because the problem is that size too. For a 20–100 person SME, the entry threshold is often larger than the problem itself.
KobiGPT's plan structure is built for that profile and prices are listed publicly: Ücretsiz plan at 0 TRY, Starter at 499 TRY/month, Pro at 4999 TRY/month. You can evaluate without waiting for a quote, which shortens the buying process itself.
When Glean is the better fit
An honest assessment requires saying this: if your knowledge really is spread across many different SaaS systems, and the search problem covers a far wider surface than a document archive, an enterprise search product is the right tool. KobiGPT does not offer a connector catalogue at that breadth.
Conversely, if the problem reads as "nobody can find our procedure documents and the same questions keep repeating", a narrowly scoped assistant is both faster to deploy and more precise in its answers. Verify current connector lists and pricing on each vendor's pages.
FAQ
Which is faster to pilot?
KobiGPT targets same-week pilots with direct document upload.
Can we use both?
Some teams keep Copilot for M365 and KobiGPT for SME docs.
Hallucinations?
RAG reduces but does not eliminate—always verify citations.
Enterprise SLA?
Contact sales for enterprise; cite public pages only.
How many source systems can it connect to?
The catalogue focuses on CRM, ERP, and legal sources; it is not at the breadth of enterprise search products. The primary document source is direct file upload.
Can we start without waiting for a quote?
Yes. Plan prices are listed publicly and the Ücretsiz plan plan requires no credit card.
Comparison
| Feature | KobiGPT | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Document RAG | Core | Varies |
| Assistant templates | Yes | Varies |
| SME pricing page | Public | Often sales-led |
| Self-hosted | Optional | Varies |