KobiGPT vs SharePoint Copilot
If content is resident in SharePoint, the advantage sits there. The question is how much of your archive really is.
TL;DR
Choose KobiGPT when you need specialist assistants with citations from your files, TR/EN support, and predictable Kobi Kredi usage. SharePoint Copilot may win on ecosystem lock-in—validate with your IT checklist.
Quick facts
- Citations
- KobiGPT: document snippets
- Deployment
- SaaS + self-hosted path
- Pricing model
- Published SME tiers + Kobi Kredi
- Languages
- Turkish and English
Why teams choose KobiGPT
- Compare total cost including indexing and support hours.
- Test answer quality on your own PDFs and policies.
- Check data residency and KVKK alignment.
- Use our compliance checklist tool before rollout.
Product facts
- Ücretsiz plan
- 100 doküman · 2 departman · 120 Kobi/ay(PLAN_CONFIG)
- Starter
- 1000 doküman · 5 departman · 1000 Kobi/ay(PLAN_CONFIG)
- Pro
- 12500 doküman · 25 departman · 12500 Kobi/ay(PLAN_CONFIG)
- Paraşüt (MCP)
- self_hosted(parasut_mcp)
- Tek Sistem ERP (MCP)
- self_hosted(teksistem_mcp)
- Hukuk kaynakları (MCP)
- self_hosted(hukuk_mcp)
- Doküman yükleme maliyeti
- 0.1 Kobi(packages/types/src/plan-config.ts → TOKEN_COSTS.DOCUMENT_UPLOAD)
- AI mesajı asgari maliyeti
- 0.1 Kobi(packages/types/src/plan-config.ts → KOBI_MIN_TURN)
The SharePoint-resident content assumption
SharePoint-based assistants assume content already sits, organised, in SharePoint libraries. When that assumption holds, the deployment threshold is low: permissions are defined, version history exists, and the search infrastructure is in place.
In practice, SMEs usually satisfy that assumption only partly. Even where SharePoint is deployed, a substantial share of content sits scattered across personal OneDrive folders, email attachments, or local file servers. Inventorying where your archive actually lives is a prerequisite to any evaluation.
Inheriting the permission model
The strength of the SharePoint-based approach is inheriting the permission model: no answer is produced from a library the user cannot reach. In a well-organised SharePoint environment that is a serious advantage requiring no extra configuration.
In exchange, it creates a dependency on the quality of that permission model. If permissions have drifted over the years, the assistant inherits the drift. In KobiGPT, access is defined in a separate layer: per-assistant document scope and four role levels. That is more setup work, but it means starting independently of existing permission debt.
Local system integration
The second differentiating area is local systems. KobiGPT's connector catalogue covers systems specific to the Turkish market, such as Paraşüt accounting, Tek Sistem ERP, and Turkish legal sources. These integrations are typically absent from global ecosystem products.
The connectors run self-hosted: access happens through an mcp-host in your own infrastructure, and write operations require individual confirmation. Refer to each vendor's own documentation for current catalogue and feature details.
FAQ
Which is faster to pilot?
KobiGPT targets same-week pilots with direct document upload.
Can we use both?
Some teams keep Copilot for M365 and KobiGPT for SME docs.
Hallucinations?
RAG reduces but does not eliminate—always verify citations.
Enterprise SLA?
Contact sales for enterprise; cite public pages only.
Can we connect our SharePoint library directly?
There is no ready SharePoint connector. Direct file upload is used instead.
Does it inherit our permissions automatically?
No. Access is defined separately on the KobiGPT side through assistant scope and user roles.
Comparison
| Feature | KobiGPT | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Document RAG | Core | Varies |
| Assistant templates | Yes | Varies |
| SME pricing page | Public | Often sales-led |
| Self-hosted | Optional | Varies |